Find your vehicle
Torsion beam and multi-link are two of the most common rear suspension configurations in modern vehicles. These setups are almost exclusively found on the rear axle, rarely on the front—so it’s no surprise that people who aren’t deeply familiar with suspension design often confuse the two.
Last time, we took a closer look at the multi-link suspension. This time, T.G.Q is diving into the world of torsion beam suspension—what it is, how it works, and why so many manufacturers still use it today.
What Is a Torsion Beam?
Torsion Beam: A Semi-Independent Suspension
In modern chassis design, the torsion beam is technically considered a semi-independent suspension system. It’s often confused with the MacPherson strut—but let’s clear that up: MacPherson is not strictly “dependent” or “independent.” It’s a unique suspension design, even though some sources loosely group it under semi-independent system.
Simple Yet Functional Construction
The construction of a torsion beam is remarkably simple. In most cases, it’s just one H-shaped piece of steel. Yes—you read that right. A single stamped and welded piece of low-carbon steel can make up the entire torsion beam. The top ends of the H connect to the car body via rubber bushings, while the lower ends attach to the wheels. Springs and dampers are mounted on the beam itself, and just like that, you’ve got a complete torsion beam suspension.
Balancing Rigidity and Flexibility
During cornering, acceleration, braking, or traveling over uneven surfaces, a suspension’s job is to help keep the tires properly aligned with the road. That means the torsion beam has to be strong enough to resist unwanted movement. At the same time, it can’t be too stiff—some torsional flexibility is needed so that the wheels don’t overly affect each other’s movement, much like how a stabilizer bar works. This also allows the dampers to do their job more effectively. So while the design might look modest on paper, balancing strength and compliance in a torsion beam is a subtle engineering challenge.
Why It’s Only Found in the Rear
Torsion beams are found exclusively on rear axles in modern cars. That’s because they aren’t meant to accommodate power delivery or steering components. Cars equipped with torsion beams most commonly paired with front-engine, front-wheel-drive layouts, which helps keep manufacturing costs down.
Upsides
1. Low production cost
Torsion beams are inexpensive to produce, making them ideal for mass-market vehicles. Their streamlined design helps automakers keep costs down without sacrificing basic functionality.
2. Fewer parts and compact packaging
With fewer components compared to multi-link or double wishbone suspension, torsion beams take up less space. That translates into more room for passengers or increased cargo capacity—particularly useful in hatchbacks and compact sedans.
3. Low maintenance and high durability
Since the beam itself is a solid piece of steel, there’s virtually nothing to maintain or replace. That’s a win for both manufacturers, who benefit from simpler production, and consumers, who enjoy fewer repair costs over time.
4. Easy to install and remove
Thanks to its simple structure, the torsion beam is easy to assemble or disassemble—making it convenient for both factory assembly lines and aftermarket service work.
5. No need for a stabilizer bar
Most suspension systems require a separate stabilizer bar—and a pair of stabilizer links to go with it—to reduce body roll. But (theoretically)a torsion beam inherently provides that stabilizing effect through its own torsional resistance. That’s three fewer parts to worry about, further lowering weight, complexity, and cost.
Downsides
1. Limited Ride Comfort
The entire suspension connects to the car body through just two rubber bushings. To maintain structural stability, these bushings need to be fairly stiff—which compromises ride comfort. As a result, fine-tuning the suspension for a smoother ride becomes a real challenge.
2. Declining Predictability Over Time
Since all longitudinal and lateral forces—like those from acceleration, braking, and cornering—are channeled through just those two bushings, their condition is critical. Over time, if the bushings wear out or degrade, the car’s handling balance can deteriorate noticeably.
3. Inferior Handling Under Aggressive Driving
Because both rear wheels are linked by a single metal beam, heavy cornering loads tend to shift more weight onto the outer wheel. While this isn’t a major issue in daily driving, it can lead to oversteer and even loss of control during aggressive maneuvers. You’ve probably seen those video clips where a car lifts an inside rear wheel mid-corner—that’s a classic trait of torsion beam suspension.
4. Limited Load-Carrying Capability
The main structural element of a torsion beam is a single stamped and welded steel plate. Unlike suspensions supported by a subframe, this setup puts the full structural load on that one beam. While it’s strong enough for typical daily use, it lacks the robustness required for heavy payloads or towing.
5. Weaker Lateral Rigidity and Road Feedback
With only one steel beam supporting the lateral forces during cornering, the structure can flex under pressure. This results in body twist and less direct road feel, especially for the rear axle—where torsion beams are always located. For more sensitive drivers, this can create a vague or delayed response, making the car feel less composed during intense driving.
Types of Torsion Beam Design
Torsion beam suspensions may look simple, but they actually come in a variety of structural forms. To help visualize it, imagine the letter “U.”
The bottom horizontal bar of the “U” (the “_” part) connects to the rear wheels, while the vertical lines of the “U” (the “| |” parts) attach to the car body via rubber bushings.
By adjusting the position of the lower beam—raising or lowering that connecting bar—you can create different torsion beam geometries. The earliest versions were truly U-shaped, but if the cross beam is moved slightly upward, you end up with more of an H-shape. Move it up even further, and it starts to resemble an ꓵ-shape.
In these variations, the two longitudinal members that run parallel to the car’s body length are sometimes referred to as trailing arms, especially when they take a more distinct role in wheel location.
Early torsion beams were U-shaped, and at a glance, they looked a lot like a rigid axle. That similarity led many people to mistakenly think torsion beams were a type of dependent suspension.
Why did automakers move beyond the basic U-shape?
The answer lies in the torsion beam’s remarkable cost-efficiency. Because it’s so affordable to produce, many makers saw potential in improving its dynamic performance without abandoning its core cost-saving advantages. By experimenting with geometry, placement, and materials, manufacturers have managed to significantly enhance handling, comfort, and structural control—all while keeping the overall design compact and low-maintenance.
Cars That Use Torsion Beam Suspensions
Volkswagen Golf Mk7 (Rear— Except GTI, GTD, R, S/RS Trims)
As one of the world’s best-selling compact cars, the Mk7 Volkswagen Golf offers a textbook example of how the torsion beam suspension fits into modern automotive design. Built on a front-engine, front-wheel-drive layout, the standard Golf uses a rear torsion beam—an efficient and cost-effective pairing that suits the car’s practical, everyday mission.
However, things change when you step up to the performance variants. Models like the Golf GTI, GTD, Golf R, and S/RS trims ditch the torsion beam in favor of a multi-link rear suspension, which provides improved handling and cornering stability. Volkswagen clearly draws a line here: torsion beam for daily drivability and space efficiency, multi-link for high performance.
Toyota Yaris/Rear
The Toyota Yaris is one of the brand’s most recognizable models, prized worldwide for its affordability and practicality. Like many compact cars with a front-engine, front-wheel-drive layout, the standard Yaris is equipped with a torsion beam rear suspension—an unsurprising but effective combination.
Nissan Sentra/ Rear
Renault Megane (2008) / Rear Suspension
French automakers have long been known as enthusiasts of the torsion beam setup—unlike many Japanese brands, which often prioritize other suspension types. While torsion beams generally aren’t celebrated for sharp handling, French engineers have put considerable effort into refining their tuning. As a result, many car enthusiasts actually appreciate the unique driving feel offered by French torsion beam suspensions. Renault, as a proud French brand, naturally equips models like the Megane with their signature torsion beam rear suspension.
5 Mercedes-Benz A-calss/ rear (without AMG)
Torsion beam suspensions are often associated with budget cars. As a luxury brand, Mercedes might not be expected to pair front-wheel drive with a torsion beam setup. However, Mercedes understands its customers well. Many A-Class buyers may not prioritize a superior driving experience, but instead appreciate the value of owning a Mercedes.
To meet this demand, Mercedes offers a more affordable torsion beam suspension on non-AMG models—providing a practical balance for those who care more about brand prestige than the absolute best in ride comfort and handling. Yet, for the high-performance trims like the A35 and A45, Mercedes opts for a multi-link rear suspension to better handle the increased power.
Multi-link
Multi-link is a completely different suspension system. It consists of a subframe located in the middle of the vehicle, with several suspension links made of metal and bushings connecting to the wheel carrier. Because it uses multiple suspension links, the cost and overall performance increase significantly compared to a torsion beam suspension. However, this design also greatly limits cabin space.
Example
For example, the BMW 1 Series. The vehicles introduced earlier in this list are mostly hatchbacks, and the 1 Series is no exception. However, among hatchbacks, the BMW 1 Series uses a front-engine, rear-wheel-drive (FR) layout combined with a multi-link rear suspension. Clearly, this is not the smart choice. But perhaps this is where the brand’s value lies. BMW has always strived to deliver the concept of “Sheer Driving Pleasure” to its consumer. This has resulted in the 1 Series offering outstanding driving dynamics, albeit at the terrible rear passenger space.
In 2019, BMW updated the 1 Series and followed Mercedes’ lead by recognizing that consumers care less about driving enjoyment in entry products. As a result, BMW switched the 1 Series to a front-engine, front-wheel-drive (FF) layout, like many other hatchbacks mentioned above. However, it still retained the multi-link suspension on the rear axle. This design strikes a balance between driving performance and cost, reflecting the brand’s trade-off between sportiness and practicality.
Conclusion
From the information above, it’s clear that the torsion beam offers an ideal solution for cost savings and space efficiency. However, handling is not its strong suit. Most of the vehicles mentioned with torsion beam suspension switch to multi-link suspensions for their sport versions.
Many car enthusiasts tend to criticize torsion beams, seeing them as a cost-cutting measure by OEMs. But suspension design itself isn’t about being “good” or “bad”—it ultimately depends on how manufacturers and consumers perceive and prioritize their needs.
References
T.G.Q R&D
T.G.Q Sales
